Michael LaBossiere, Professor of Philosophy at the Florida A&M University, listed of 42 categories of erroneous arguments which frequently occur in conversations to propel them to deadlocks or wrong conclusions. Arunabha Sengupta opines these fallacies are nowhere more singularly showcased than in cricket discussions between the analyst and the hardcore fan.Saturday, July 7, 2012
Informed Analyst vs Prejudiced Fan - 42 fallacies of cricket discussions
Michael LaBossiere, Professor of Philosophy at the Florida A&M University, listed of 42 categories of erroneous arguments which frequently occur in conversations to propel them to deadlocks or wrong conclusions. Arunabha Sengupta opines these fallacies are nowhere more singularly showcased than in cricket discussions between the analyst and the hardcore fan.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment